![]() She's more likely to end up in smaller, low tier maps and battles so a lot of time it feels better. She just gets to fight at closer ranges (usually) since she's a tier lower in MM. Warspites dispersion is comparable to Hoods. What I would do is change the Sigma to 2.0 like Nagato and Colorado have and increase the Krupp value of her shells to match Warspite's so that her penetration doesn't suck. Hood's dispersion is the same as Warspite, Queen Elizabeth and Vanguard as, until Repulse which has better dispersion, all BL 15 MK I guns, until Repulse, had the same, improved dispersion when compared to the US BB dispersion.Ī return to her old special Defensive Fire AA multiplier would be nice, but not really important. ![]() Three BBs, Yamato, Shikishima and Bajei(sp?), have 2.1. Hood's Sigma is 1.9, which is almost the maximum common sigma of 2.0 for BBs. I think any two of the above would make the ship more enjoyable without overpowering her. While I am not sure, I believe Warspite has a better dispersion or sigma value. More specifically it seems people rave far more about Warspite and the Repulse has turned out to be a lot more fun with it’s improved dispersion. ![]() For being the once “Pride of the Royal Navy” - HMS Hood seems a bit underwhelming in today’s WoWS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |